Archive for the ‘Rants’ Category

On Asking For a Job

September 12th, 2011 | No Comments »

I got an email from a stranger the other day. Someone who wants to be a creative-type, found HistoricalTweets.com, and thought they’d reach out to me. A nice person, but one problem.

In their first sentence, they asked for a job. Didn’t beat around the bush. Didn’t ask about opportunities. Didn’t hint at the desire to work with/for me. Full-on asked for a job at McBeard.

I wrote a simple and kind reply, but the more I thought about it, I thought I might write a more thorough post on how to cold-pitch people for jobs or gigs or freelance work. I wish someone had written this to me when I was 22.

So, my advice:

(more…)

The Streamys: Who Knew We’d Be This Angry?

April 13th, 2010 | 7 Comments »

Okay, we get it.  The Streamys sucked this year.

I’ve seen enough “nail in the coffin” and “last Streamys ever” updates on Twitter.  They get it.  They did a bad job.

There are a lot of people who have meticulously deconstructed why the show went wrong, from the bad opening number to the streakers to the embarrassing technical glitches (in a room full of nerds, no less) the “nobody cares about online video” man-on-the-street video to the way-too-long and obscene “comedy” bits.

As an IAWTV member and someone who knows the show’s executive producers Marc, Drew, Brady, and Josh personally — I’ll add this to the conversation: just one year ago, this didn’t even exist.

This was an event that literally didn’t exist a year ago.  And though I think the show was really bad and a detriment to the  momentum we all feel about online video, people are calling for heads to roll.  Really?

Without the Tubefilter guys, would this even exist?  No.  Would there be a community as thriving as there is in Los Angeles?  No.  So let’s back off a little, because these guys aren’t money-grubbing, smarmy used car salesmen.  Trust me, they’re taking this seriously and will come forward with a plan.  That doesn’t happen in 24 hours.

Do I think this was a bad show that showcased the juvenile nature of the Web against its more established media counterparts?  Yes. But the result — the backbiting and negative comments — are proving the other stereotype of the Internet: not unlike the comments on a YouTube video, a lot of people are hating on something they don’t want to do (or couldn’t do) themselves.  These guys built this from nothing.  Give them a break.

BEHIND THE FRUSTRATION

I wonder if a lot of the frustration with the show is because there feels like something was lost.  A naive dream, perhaps.  Web series creators, including the majority of people in that theatre, make little money and can’t support themselves doing it like their TV or film counterparts.  Surely, a Streamy Awards show debacle doesn’t help them getting closer to “sustainable living,” but surely the big payoff wasn’t so close that the Streamys ruined it.

The sad truth is that, for most online content producers (and offline for that matter), there is very little income to be spread around right now, and for independents who are also “up and comers” — myself included — there is a smaller and smaller pie.  Celebrities that you might normally see on TV and movies are taking advantage of online opportunities (such as Kevin Pollak, Tony Hale, Zach Galifianakis, Illeana Douglas) to have more creative control and ownership over their work.  Traditional media companies and ad agencies are looking for “sure things” from people with TV/film experience.  Sure, there are indies that get funding and/or distribution.  But for every Bannen Way, there’s a thousand Web series that won’t make a cent.

It’s tough to be independent.  But it’s just tough in general.  That’s the entertainment business, regardless of medium.  The road for online producers/creators/writers isn’t an easy one.  And you can’t blame the Streamy Awards this year for you not getting what you want.

If you want to make Web videos, do it. And keep doing it.  Just like the Oscars and Emmys — just do what you do and let the awards take care of themselves.

But don’t look to the Tubefilter guys as scapegoats.  If you want things to change, offer to help.  I’m sure they’re all ears to real criticism if offered with a helping hand.

[Some updates made above to my rhetoric and logic, after some comments called them out below.]

LMU Home Page: Subtle Interactivity

September 12th, 2008 | No Comments »

I don’t think I’ve stumbled upon Loyola Marymount’s site in quite some time, because I haven’t seen this new design.

The home page, like every other university web site out there, has a large photo-centric center section that corresponds with a recent news-ish story.

There’s a tiny bit of interactivity with the mouse on LMU’s page, however, and despite how subtle it is, it really works. It got me to stick around the page minutes longer than I otherwise would, and it just makes it more fun.

Quantifiable? No. It’s a surprise a little feature like this made it through the various discussions that I know happen at institutions of higher learning (“Will people get it?” “Is it too flashy?” “Will this make us look too hip/trendy/fun?”).

Way to go, LMU. It almost makes up for your crazy, almost unreadable URL-naming system:

Give bloggers a chance, will ya?

Got Originality?

August 4th, 2008 | No Comments »

Ask my wife: my biggest pet peeve is seeing “Got _________?” stickers around Los Angeles.

You know.  Blatant rip-offs of the Got Milk? ad campaign? (Side note: did you know that the Aaron Burr Got Milk? commercial was directed by Michael Bay?)

On trucks, billboards, sidewalks, and signs.  I see another one and think, “Got Creativity?”

Nope.  They don’t.

Here are a couple of my faves.  If I see more, I’ll make it into a series.  If you see any, send me a link or the photo itself.


Got Fish?

(more…)